Search for: All records

Background and aims: Nutrient addition increases plant aboveground production but causes species richness decline in many herbaceous communities. Asymmetric competition for light and detrimental effects of nitrogen have been shown to cause species richness decline in mesic ecosystems. However, it remains unclear whether and how other limiting factors may also play a role in the decline of species richness, especially in ecosystems where soil water could be more limiting. Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of > 1600 experiments on nutrient and water addition across grasslands worldwide. Results: We find that nitrogen addition, alone or combined with other nutrients, significantly increases aboveground production but decreases species richness. However, water addition can avoid species loss when nutrients were added, indicating that water is a crucial limiting resource in driving species richness decline under nutrient addition. Overall, water limitation may be the primary driver of species richness decline under nutrient addition in approximately 70% of global grassland areas where mean annual soil water content is ≤ 30%. Therefore, as nutrient availability increases in global grasslands, soil moisture limitation may be responsible for the decline of species richness in regions. Conclusion: Our study quantifies the soil water threshold below which plant species is mainly driven by water limitation, and highlights a novel and widespread mechanism driving species richness decline in global grasslands under nutrient addition. 

Abstract A central role for nature-based solution is to identify optimal management practices to address environmental challenges, including carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation. Inorganic fertilization increases plant aboveground biomass but often causes a tradeoff with plant diversity loss. It remains unclear, however, whether organic fertilization, as a potential nature-based solution, could alter this tradeoff by increasing aboveground biomass without plant diversity loss. Here we compile data from 537 experiments on organic and inorganic fertilization across grasslands and croplands worldwide to evaluate the responses of aboveground biomass, plant diversity, and soil organic carbon (SOC). Both organic and inorganic fertilization increase aboveground biomass by 56% and 42% relative to ambient, respectively. However, only inorganic fertilization decreases plant diversity, while organic fertilization increases plant diversity in grasslands with greater soil water content. Moreover, organic fertilization increases SOC in grasslands by 19% and 15% relative to ambient and inorganic fertilization, respectively. The positive effect of organic fertilization on SOC increases with increasing mean annual temperature in grasslands, a pattern not observed in croplands. Collectively, our findings highlight organic fertilization as a potential nature-based solution that can increase two ecosystem services of grasslands, forage production, and soil carbon storage, without a tradeoff in plant diversity loss.